USB is tied to a computer host, has wimpy bus power, and no approved
wireless implementation. The USB connectors are not durable and are costly
to terminate.
I'm thinking more along the path of a cheap Ethernet UDPv6 module with an
OSC implementation. The cabling for twisted pair ethernet is inexpensive,
easy to test and terminate, and can be easily connected using common
networking equipment. Too bad that a cheap development board is still $70+
If you can come up with an A/D input hardware module that's $25-50 and
implements OSC over UDPv6, then you've got a reasonable means to avoid tying
your stuff to a computer host.
Any EE's listening in? :-)
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's wrong with USB? Too slow?
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Eric Shattow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ping me when there's a cheap (n < $25usd) OpenSoundControl module to
> build a
> > control surface with... USB is no good.
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
