On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Sean M. Pappalardo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Albert Santoni wrote: >> if anyone with decks wants to verify that vinyl control still works in >> the branch, please send me an email with your results! > > Just tested last night. It still works, but not very well on my Celeron > system since the sound card only supports 48kHz so Mixxx has to do > sample rate conversion from the 44.1kHz song while painting the screen > and interpreting the vinyl timecode, etc. Performance is significantly > better if I minimize the Mixxx screen. (For some reason, Xorg takes up > 75% of my CPU while Mixxx is running, regardless of whether it's > minimized or not. But Mixxx's processor load drops to just under 30% > with vinyl control when minimized. If it's in the foreground, it wants > 75% of the CPU too resulting in massive dropouts and sluggish/freezing > GUI, etc.) > > So what are we doing that's aggravating Xorg so much?
Anything :D (j/k) I'm a little confused here - Are you saying vinyl control performance has worsened or that Mixxx's performance in general (even without vinyl control) has worsened? (... or is performance just not very good on your machine, unchanged from 1.6.1?) Can you please clarify for us? There's also all these other variables here like graphics driver version, Xorg version, compiz version, phase of the moon, etc, so we have to be careful if you think we have a regression. :) Thanks, Albert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
