Disclaimer - I may be totally off-base and this could be very left-field:

I don't think anything in our audio code has really changed
appreciably since 1.6.1. Can someone verify whether this issue occurs
with 1.6.1 on Jaunty or not?

I was digging around to find out if any other applications have seen
weird "ALSA's playback stream is dying" bugs, and it turns out
PulseAudio saw a similar one in both Ubuntu 8.10 and 9.04. The bug
involves some sort of buckling under high CPU load:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/237443

The problem is that details are weak on this bug. There's a changelog
for a revision which claims it fixes the bug, which includes:
"  * Last upload, specifically 0091_workaround_alsa_horkage, fixes:
    LP: #235990, #237443, #279847, #317997, #323185, #330814,
    LP: #334874."

Now, I can't find this 0091_workaround_alsa_horkage patch available
anywhere publically on the internet, and the person who posted that
(Daniel Chen) was equally vague on IRC when I asked him about it. He
basically just said the kernel/ALSA/alsa-lib are borked in 8.10 and
9.04, but failed to give any more details. He said 9.10 should fix
these issues (specifically the combination of the
kernel/ALSA/alsa-lib).

So there's a few things we can try to see if this is really an ALSA issue:
1) Try 1.6.1 on 9.04 and see if the same problem happens (lockup
during playback)
2) Try 1.6.1 and latest 1.7.0 on the latest Ubuntu 9.10 alpha, and see
if the issue remains.
3) Maybe something else, I'm jetlagged at the moment.

Or, the ALSA bug the PulseAudio developers purportedly saw might have
nothing to do with our problem, but we should try to figure this out
before we release a 1.7.0 final.

Thanks,
Albert

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM, James Evans<[email protected]> wrote:
> Ronald Stewart wrote:
>> what's in Jaunty that was not in Hardy to cause these issues?
>>
>
> I've no idea Ron. I am neither an Ubuntu developer nor a Mixxx
> developer. There's a bug report in for it, and the Mixxx devs are
> involved in the thread, so I'm sure it will get looks at as and when
> they're able to.
>
> Are you not finding it's ok using OSS? That way you can play your tunes
> and have a nice cup of tea.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim.
>
>> Thank you
>> Ron
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:08 AM, James Evans <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Sean,
>>
>>     Sean M. Pappalardo wrote:
>>      > Is this the same thing as bug
>>      > https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/1.7/+bug/383431 ?
>>      >
>>
>>     Yep, that's exactly it. I had a brief look through the bugs, obviously
>>     not enough.
>>
>>     Do you still need more backtraces?
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>
>>     Jim.
>>
>>      > Sean
>>      >
>>      >
>>     
>> <<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
>>      > This E-Mail message has been scanned for viruses
>>      > and cleared by >>SmartMail<< from Smarter Technology, Inc.
>>      >
>>     
>> <<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
>>      >
>>      >
>>
>>
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Mixxx-devel mailing list
>>     [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Mixxx-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel

Reply via email to