On Wed, 16 May 2001, Clayton wrote: > As a followup to my e-mail, check out these graphs. Same car, CIS-E vs. > Motronic and also Motronic vs. Motronic with fuel mixture bumped up. > The info is on the charts. It's pretty obvious that CIS-E does > something wrong (my guess is it dosen't provide enough fuel). Anyway, > check it out. I would like to read some critical hypothesis regarding > all this. Maybe I need to put Motronic on my car? > Clayton > > > CIS-E vs. Motronic > http://www.netacc.net/~brett/bv-99vs2k.jpg > > Motronic vs. Motronic with fuel bumped up a little bit > http://www.netacc.net/~brett/bv-dyno2k.jpg >
I'd be interested to see a comparison of CIS-E and CIS-E + K-Star. K-Star is a piggyback system that allows control of fuel and ignition (within a certain range) at 500 rpm increments. Not as fine grained as some other systems, but still pretty cool. THe best part? it's completely "plug-n-play" with the CIS-E system. I would think with some dyno time you would be able to really optimize the system. It also has provisions for a throttle position or MAP sensor, and ability to control a 5th injector for more fuel. Autotech sells it for like $5-600... and while that's a lot of money, it sounds like it's pretty cool. It would definitely be less work on a non central electric car. http://www.milford.ndirect.co.uk/kstar.html _____________ List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
