I haven't seen any bad reviews about the AT camset at all. I've seen alot of posts on the Vortex from people who had no idea what their baseline hp and torque were, and didn't dyno afterwards. I don't believe what anyone's "butt-dyno" says. Unless you've dynoed beforehand and afterwards, you can't really say whats' happened.
I chose the AT camset mostly because it's the only one that's CARB legal and it's also by far the cheapest for me, as I'm an AT dealer. I've heard some good things about the TT camset, but they cost almost 50% more for me and I doubt they'll perform all that much better than the AT set. The Schricks are just stupidly expensive and you have to upgrade the valve springs, so that's an additional expense. In addition, the TT heavy duty valve springs have been breaking and trashing people's heads. No thanks!! -josh --- Chad Rebuck <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, josh Wyte wrote: > > > I've got a 2l bottom end, Motronic injection, GIAC > > chip, eurosport exhaust. I'd like to see dyno > charts > > of the AT camset in a stock, non-ported 1.8 16v > head > > with the above setup (2l, etc). Anyone? Bueller? > > > I've seen a lot of bad reviews about the Autotech > cams, and never read > even a single positive one. What made you choose > Autotech over Schrick or > Techtonics? Just wondering. > > _______________________________________________ > A2-16v mailing list > [email protected] > http://maillist.myip.org/mailman/listinfo/a2-16v ===== Josh Wyte Momentum Motorsports 508-833-3024 After 5 pm EST __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com
