Keith,

From your email you seem to imply that the Maltese Telecom sector is as healthy and competitive and nothing better could ever be achieved for the consumer.

Take note of the following:

You are correct in stating that Vodafone has similar pricing to Datastream for Bandwidth. However keep in mind that Vodafone has a fraction of the customers that Datastream have for International bandwidth.

Therefore if vodafone with very little customers can already give an equivalent price to Datastream who have many customers, How much better could the vodafone price be if they had more customers ?

From what happened in similar situations in other markets, this means that the supply could actually double for the same price if there was true competition.

The problem is that there is no true competition because ISPs currently still have no option but to buy the largest part of their bandwidth from Vodafone since ISPs are still under the obligation of an old contract they had no option but to sign before the existence of the Vodafone service.

Mark my words, the minute the contract in question goes away, prices for bandwidth will half once again.

Do not tell me that you would not like to get double the bandwidth for the same price ?

As you can see, in such scenarios, it is irrelevant then to whom the money is being paid because the consumer will always be getting the best deal possible through fair and correct negotiations.

Last but not least do not forget your taxes. The ISP companies of these monopolies are not paying any taxes as you and I. Now if you feel comfortable with that then keep subscribing to their services.

Competition issues are not simple but it is globally known that only real competition brings about healthy markets and healthy economies. To my knowledge we have none of these two on the island. High time we pulled our act together before the bubble bursts.

Over and out.

Conrad.

Keith Vassallo wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 10:52 +0100, Conrad Laus wrote:


The point here is to switch to a non monopoly funded ISP so that this ISP will have more financial power to negotiate better with anyone who can offer a more competitive deal for the final benefit of the subscriber.


In that case, any ISP except Maltanet or Onvol is non-monopoly funded.
However, that ISP is funding a monopoly - you're always using Maltanet
in the end.


From whom the infrastructure is bought is not that much relevant over time if the ISPs are empowered by the subscriber base. The game being played by Datastream and Melita is precisely this. They do not want the other ISPs to be in strong negotiating positions.


How can any other ISP be in a strong position? We have more than 18 ISPs
for a population of 400,000!

One point which has not been mentioned yet in this thread is the issue
of international bandwidth competition. As you stated, Malta has only
very recently experienced competition in international bandwidth, due to
the provision of this service by Vodafone. However, I have been told
that Vodafone sells bandwidth at approximately the same rate as
Datastream/Maltanet (correct me if I'm wrong). So really there's no
apparent benefit for any ISP to stop using the DS/Maltanet bandwidth -
they'd be paying the same and getting the same. How typical of Malta.
Instead of companies healthily competing and the customer benefiting
from this, companies agree to not start a "price war" and keep prices
fixed.
What some ISPs are doing right now is purchasing half their bandwidth
from DS/Maltanet and the rest from Vodafone. However, this neither
decreases prices nor provides better speeds. What it does is increase
connection reliability.

Keith


Regards

Noel Pulis wrote:

Hi all,

I agree with all that you say. The problem in Malta, as I see it, is the
problem of monopoly and shit. I used to work with an ISP too, using Lavander
system which was very good at first.

After a while Datastream had the idea of starting up the new system of
Stream! Oh well, still people went with other ISPs. Then Datastream decided
to merge with Maltanet, thus killing all ISP with the LM9.99.

Although it killed them before with the 2Mbit upgrade. Also Datastream
instructed all the ISP's that modem replacements are to be done no more from
the ISPs but if a client of ex. LinuxNET had a modem fault, LinuxNET has to
send the client to replace the modem at MaltaNET! A competitor who literally
used to ask the client if he was happy with the service and offer MaltaNET
services!

Also at the ISP I used to work offered the client the Activation of line in
3 Weeks max. One time a client was held 5 Weeks to do a line activation and
then when they confirmed that the line is ready and he can connect..... he
couldn’t (there was a fault in the line). Instead of fixing the line there
and then, they simply told me to open a fault report for him. The client
waited 2 more days to begin using his internet. Now, If you go to MaltaNET
and do a new connection, they either give it to you that day or the day
after. BTW, They used to give me hell when there was a problem at a client.

The thing to literally change to Vodafone (all ISPs), is not a bad thing.
The problem is that the ISP would still use Datastream infrastructure to get
internet. Another solution is to change to Cable, or the most expensive
solution for an ISP is to rewire all Malta.

Personally I Disagree with bandwidth limit. I think it should be Unlimited
but the ISP should limit P2P. There is a way to distinguish between Normal
web download(Example ISO's Of Linux, And stuff like that) And the P2P
transfer.

So, iether MCA, and EU regulators are blind or I, am going crazy.


Noel

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Keith Vassallo
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:04 PM
To: Malta Linux User Group - general list
Subject: Re: [LINUX.ORG.MT] Re: Internet latency times

Hi Conrad,
I agree that for people who use the Internet lightly, any local ISP will
provide a good enough Internet service. However, when I mentioned "good
ISP" I was referring to the needs of Graham, which I assumed (correctly)
needed to make heavy use of the service. This is the reason why I doubt
a local ISP will provide him, or myself, with a good enough service for
our needs - unless you're ready to pay of course. I have in fact
contacted several ISPs trying to get on a business connection - which
supposedly has better service at a higher price. However, even though
I'm registered as self employed and have a VAT number, nobody will give
me a business connection. Also, regular home users are not able to get a
business connection.

I personally don't download any illegal software what-so-ever. If many
people did the same, then not a fourth of the people who complain about
the Internet would complain. However, I do download a lot of Linux ISOs,
Gentoo updates, program demos etc..., even as part of my work. It is for
this reason that I simply can't work with bandwidth limits.
In the UK, the trend is now to remove limits. Both AOL and Telewest
provide an ADSL service with no limits for £14.99 a month. Of course,
I'm not expecting local ISPs to be able to compete (that's insane!)
however, this trend of offering an unlimited service is now spreading
throught several European countries, including France, Sweden etc...
etc...

You also mention that we should not subscribe to ISPs of local
monopolies. Can you tell me how? Since Datastream is now Maltanet, which
is an ISP, and which is the company selling bandwidth to other ISPs, no
matter what ISP I choose I always end up paying Maltanet/Datastream.
Basically, if everyone switched away from Maltanet, Maltanet would still
be in business. One would have to switch to an ISP which only buys
bandwidth from Vodafone... I don't know of any ISP which does this
myself. I'd be glad to find out.

What might be interesting is that now several local ISPs are
researching, or testing, wireless broadband connection services, with
some ISPs offering up to 6Mbit. We'll have to wait and see.

Keith

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:38 +0100, Conrad Laus wrote:


Hi Keith,

I`ve been working with an ISP for the past six years and I have the inside version of the facts. Your comment about "good ISP" and "Malta" being a paradox is not correct. From my experience different people have different expectations and no isp is able to cater for all the different tastes and desires. If you think that this only applies for Malta then you are wrong.

Broadband limits by Volume started in other countries a number of years before they started in Malta. Telephone support provided by most large ISPs in other countries is on expensive pay by the minute phone numbers. In Malta this has not been the case.

Then again, keep in mind that in other countries, Liberalisation and real competition in the Telecoms sector has started around 10 years ago. In Malta we have not yet started for all is still controlled directly or indirectly by the old monopolies.

At the end of the day, it is known that levels of service in any sector only improve when real competition is promoted. Government has little interest at the moment in promoting this for he would be damaging his own company and those of political friends. As users, I think we should promote this by not subscribing with the ISPs of the old

monopolies.


This way, the non monopoly funded ISPS will grow stronger and be able to provide better services.

Cheers

Conrad

Keith Vassallo wrote:


Hi Shawn,

IMHO, "good ISP" and "Malta" are quite a paradox. Anyway, I've tried
several ISPs:

Maltanet: Great speeds, but with a 12GB download limit (depends on which
plan you choose)
Waldonet: I was with Waldonet for two months. Phoned for support four
times. Nevery got a reply. Switched to another ISP. (This is just my
experience though, not saying Waldonet have bad support).
Bellnet: They say the speeds are quite good. A friend of mine complains
that he has no idea what limits his bandwidth has, since Bellnet use the
Datastream (ehem, I should say maltanet) lavender service, the last time
I checked. Also, if you want to setup a home server, forget about
bellnet.
Keyworld: No download limits, but you only get decent speeds at night.
I'm supposed to have a 2Mbit connection but download with half-megabit
speeds.
Melitanet, your current ISP: Don't even think about them.

Again, this is only my experience and opinion, your experience may vary.

Keith

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 06:37 +0100, Shawn Cassar wrote:



Sorry people to jutt in like this. I am new to the list but have been following linux and it's developments since I was a kid, have 3 comps at


home (including my lappy) running Mandrake only (no dual boot).

I am seeing you talk about isp ping rate, I too am with Melitanet and I

want

to change ASAP cause the service and performance is terrible, plus they

are

charging me Lm21 per month for nothing.

So, in your opinions which are the best 2 isps right now? (One with

download

limits and the Other without).

I have been told to either switch to Bellnet or to Waldonet.  Anybody

has

experience about any of these 2 during peak hours?

Thanks alot




Waldonet offers unlimited downloads too. A bit on the expensive side though..




Keyworld offers unlimited downloads, actually (I dont work at Keyworld
hehe).

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 04:08 -0800, Graham Petley wrote:





The response time is quite variable. Recent pings give:
$ ping -c 10 kh.google.com (about 1245)
--- kh.l.google.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received,
0% packet loss, time 9034ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 143.385/188.061/399.220/87.340 ms

$ ping -c 10 kh.google.com (about 12.55)
--- kh.l.google.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received,
0% packet loss, time 9039ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.242/85.977/89.495/2.958 ms

In fact, this morning Google Earth, whch was simply not responding yesterday
evening, was working fine. I suppose 20:45 in the evening is a peak

time

to
California. I use Melita Cable as my ISP. I would shift if anyone

offered


unlimited downloads, but I don't think anyone does.
My web site is still slow :-(
$ ping -c 10 vlsitechnology.org (about 12.56)
--- vlsitechnology.org ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received,
0% packet loss, time 9019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 211.454/215.173/222.490/3.495 ms

- Graham Petley
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list




--
Captain Alan Muscat
403. 'Zephyr',
Mikiel Ang. Grima Street,
Pembroke  STJ 07
MALTA.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +356 21 372773
Mob: +356 99 423001
Fax: +356 21 374764


_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!


http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

--
Conrad Laus
Network Engineering
Waldonet Ltd.
27 Triq iz-Zaghfran
Attard, BZN 03
Malta
Web: http://www.waldonet.net.mt
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +356 2141 9100
DDI: +356 2333 0007
GSM: +356 9945 7720
Fax: +356 2141 9300

Reply via email to