And it's gone!

couldn't take it anymore, backed up and formatted, back to arch

On 2 May 2010 12:07, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm backing up before i blow a fuse and throw everything out of the
> window..
>
>
> On 2 May 2010 12:15, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Everything worked fine especially for me, being just a simple user. What
>> I admired most was the clean installation of AWN.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On il-Ħadd, 02 ta Mej, 2010 08:52 , Ramon Casha wrote:
>>
>> I did an upgrade (Kubuntu) and everything worked without a hitch.
>>
>>
>> Ramon Casha
>>
>>
>> On 1 May 2010 22:26, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm pining for arch atm...
>>>
>>> dont have the guts to waste time on it with pure maths coming up :/
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2010 10:18 PM, Jean Azzopardi wrote:
>>> > Ditch it and get Windows 7.
>>> >
>>> > Oh, wait. I mean Arch Linux :P
>>> > Srsly, I doubt ext4 regression would give you all that problem. My
>>> > best guess is that some stuff didn't get updated while some did. My
>>> > dad got the same problem when he upgraded to Karmic. While everything
>>> > upgraded, the graphics drivers didn't, and I had to do some fishing
>>> > around.
>>> >
>>> > I'd recommend a fresh installation. Or Windows 7. (incidentally, I've
>>> > been getting 1 BSOD a month :|)
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Anton Xuereb<[email protected]>
>>>  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me.
>>> >>
>>> >> No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black
>>> screen
>>> >> since then)
>>> >> Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it.
>>> >> Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys.
>>> >> Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5
>>> seconds.
>>> >>
>>> >> Re-installed video driver, changed nothing.
>>> >> Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad.
>>> >>
>>> >> Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos im
>>> on
>>> >> the brink of madness :/
>>> >>
>>> >> M
>>> >>
>>> >> On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Joseph,
>>> >>      I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point
>>> in
>>> >> your thesis, why bother?
>>> >>
>>> >> If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
>>> >> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
>>> >> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
>>> >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install...
>>> install
>>> >> is OK and I have the functionality I need...
>>> >>
>>> >> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
>>> >> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after
>>> I
>>> >> upgrade to 10.04
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers
>>> >>
>>> >> Joseph
>>> >>
>>> >> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb"<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released
>>> a
>>> >>> whole load of bugs..
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's
>>> fine,
>>> >>>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that
>>> nothing
>>> >>>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at
>>> the
>>> >>>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> ok 10.04 first impressions..
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> i want my 9.10 back!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> now!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb<[email protected]
>>> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>      upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually
>>> worked
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>      On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg<[email protected]
>>> >>>>>      <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>          I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change
>>> the
>>> >>>>>          download server:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>          go to Systems ->  Administration _>  Software Sources
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>          Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can
>>> click
>>> >>>>>          Other ->  Select Best Server)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>          On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb
>>> >>>>>          <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>  wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>              Hey guys,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>              Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu
>>> >>>>>              version, unfortunately the automatic updater
>>> >>>>>              (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to
>>> point
>>> >>>>>              to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess
>>> atm,
>>> >>>>>              is slower than watching paint dry.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>              Is there some way of forcing it to use a different
>>> mirror
>>> >>>>>              for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>              M
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>              _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>              MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >>>>>              [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> >>>>>
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>          _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>          MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >>>>>          [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> >>>>>          http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> >>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>>> >>>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not
>>> the
>>> >>>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>>> >>>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>>> >>>> copied without the senders consent.
>>> >>>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>>> >>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>> >>>> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
>>> >>>> view of Philip Toledo Limited
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >>>> [email protected]
>>> >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>>> >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
>>> >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>>> >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>>> copied
>>> >> without the senders consent.
>>> >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>>> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>> sender,
>>> >> except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of
>>> Philip
>>> >> Toledo Limited
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > MLUG-list mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing 
>> [email protected]http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
>

<<image/jpeg>>

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to