I had similar regressions with ext4 too, even crashes. I couldn't pin it
down at the time due to the fact that the partition was on a remote iSCSI
server and part of an LVM. However since when I converted to ext3, it has
been stable for 2 weeks. I used to get a crash every 2-3 days before when
under high load.

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jean Azzopardi <[email protected]>wrote:

> Ditch it and get Windows 7.
>
> Oh, wait. I mean Arch Linux :P
> Srsly, I doubt ext4 regression would give you all that problem. My
> best guess is that some stuff didn't get updated while some did. My
> dad got the same problem when he upgraded to Karmic. While everything
> upgraded, the graphics drivers didn't, and I had to do some fishing
> around.
>
> I'd recommend a fresh installation. Or Windows 7. (incidentally, I've
> been getting 1 BSOD a month :|)
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me.
> >
> > No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black
> screen
> > since then)
> > Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it.
> > Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys.
> > Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5 seconds.
> >
> > Re-installed video driver, changed nothing.
> > Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad.
> >
> > Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos im on
> > the brink of madness :/
> >
> > M
> >
> > On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joseph,
> >     I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point in
> > your thesis, why bother?
> >
> > If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
> > default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
> > notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
> > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install
> > is OK and I have the functionality I need...
> >
> > Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
> > losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I
> > upgrade to 10.04
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Joseph
> >
> > On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a
> >>whole load of bugs..
> >>
> >>http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
> >>
> >>On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
> >>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine,
> >>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that nothing
> >>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the
> >>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
> >>>> ok 10.04 first impressions..
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> i want my 9.10 back!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> now!
> >>>>
> >>>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]
> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>     upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg <[email protected]
> >>>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>         I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the
> >>>>         download server:
> >>>>
> >>>>         go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources
> >>>>
> >>>>         Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click
> >>>>         Other -> Select Best Server)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb
> >>>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             Hey guys,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu
> >>>>             version, unfortunately the automatic updater
> >>>>             (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point
> >>>>             to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm,
> >>>>             is slower than watching paint dry.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror
> >>>>             for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             M
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             _______________________________________________
> >>>>             MLUG-list mailing list
> >>>>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>>             http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         _______________________________________________
> >>>>         MLUG-list mailing list
> >>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>>         http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> MLUG-list mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
> >>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
> >>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
> >>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
> >>> copied without the senders consent.
> >>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
> >>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> >>> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
> >>> view of Philip Toledo Limited
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> MLUG-list mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
> > privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
> > intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
> > immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or copied
> > without the senders consent.
> > We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
> > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> > except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Philip
> > Toledo Limited
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to