Amen, bro.
pacman -Syu :P

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:

> And it's gone!
>
> couldn't take it anymore, backed up and formatted, back to arch
>
>
> On 2 May 2010 12:07, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm backing up before i blow a fuse and throw everything out of the
>> window..
>>
>>
>> On 2 May 2010 12:15, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Everything worked fine especially for me, being just a simple user. What
>>> I admired most was the clean installation of AWN.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On il-Ħadd, 02 ta Mej, 2010 08:52 , Ramon Casha wrote:
>>>
>>> I did an upgrade (Kubuntu) and everything worked without a hitch.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ramon Casha
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1 May 2010 22:26, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm pining for arch atm...
>>>>
>>>> dont have the guts to waste time on it with pure maths coming up :/
>>>>
>>>> On 05/01/2010 10:18 PM, Jean Azzopardi wrote:
>>>> > Ditch it and get Windows 7.
>>>> >
>>>> > Oh, wait. I mean Arch Linux :P
>>>> > Srsly, I doubt ext4 regression would give you all that problem. My
>>>> > best guess is that some stuff didn't get updated while some did. My
>>>> > dad got the same problem when he upgraded to Karmic. While everything
>>>> > upgraded, the graphics drivers didn't, and I had to do some fishing
>>>> > around.
>>>> >
>>>> > I'd recommend a fresh installation. Or Windows 7. (incidentally, I've
>>>> > been getting 1 BSOD a month :|)
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Anton Xuereb<[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black
>>>> screen
>>>> >> since then)
>>>> >> Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it.
>>>> >> Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys.
>>>> >> Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5
>>>> seconds.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Re-installed video driver, changed nothing.
>>>> >> Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos
>>>> im on
>>>> >> the brink of madness :/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> M
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi Joseph,
>>>> >>      I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this
>>>> point in
>>>> >> your thesis, why bother?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove
>>>> the
>>>> >> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
>>>> >> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
>>>> >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install...
>>>> install
>>>> >> is OK and I have the functionality I need...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
>>>> >> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after
>>>> I
>>>> >> upgrade to 10.04
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Cheers
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Joseph
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb"<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they
>>>> released a
>>>> >>> whole load of bugs..
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's
>>>> fine,
>>>> >>>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that
>>>> nothing
>>>> >>>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at
>>>> the
>>>> >>>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> ok 10.04 first impressions..
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> i want my 9.10 back!
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> now!
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb<[email protected]
>>>> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>      upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually
>>>> worked
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>      On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg<[email protected]
>>>> >>>>>      <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>          I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change
>>>> the
>>>> >>>>>          download server:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>          go to Systems ->  Administration _>  Software Sources
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>          Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can
>>>> click
>>>> >>>>>          Other ->  Select Best Server)
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>          On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb
>>>> >>>>>          <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>              Hey guys,
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>              Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu
>>>> >>>>>              version, unfortunately the automatic updater
>>>> >>>>>              (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to
>>>> point
>>>> >>>>>              to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess
>>>> atm,
>>>> >>>>>              is slower than watching paint dry.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>              Is there some way of forcing it to use a different
>>>> mirror
>>>> >>>>>              for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>              M
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>              _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>              MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >>>>>              [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>          MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >>>>>          [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>>>>          http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>>>> >>>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not
>>>> the
>>>> >>>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>>>> >>>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>>>> >>>> copied without the senders consent.
>>>> >>>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>>>> >>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>>> >>>> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
>>>> >>>> view of Philip Toledo Limited
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >>>> [email protected]
>>>> >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>>>> >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
>>>> >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>>>> >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>>>> copied
>>>> >> without the senders consent.
>>>> >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>>>> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>>> sender,
>>>> >> except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of
>>>> Philip
>>>> >> Toledo Limited
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing 
>>> [email protected]http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>

<<image/jpeg>>

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to