-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Bill Price wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5)
iEYEAREKAAYFAkn0aksACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oI+kQCePcSFg1UGqQcxQOGLc+PjPLgD TPgAn1xidOQqoOAHE26g+hfPHW4+BG0w =3rMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > As an update, I drew up a table showing subject compliance, i.e. how > many subjects studied on each date for which I have data: > > http://tinyurl.com/dfmzqd > > Subjects failed to submit learning data 4.46% of the time. To break it > down by group, the spaced repetition group had a noncompliance rate of > 3.57% and the intuitive repetition group had a noncompliance rate of > 5.36%. No participant missed more than two out of 16 data submission > opportunities. OK, that's good, I think. 5% vs. 3% says there's no real difference (given the small sample sizes, sounds well within random variation right?); I interpret this as another bit of evidence that spacing is intrinsically better than intuitive studying and not just encouraging compliance. -- gwern --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
