> > I guess the > > alternative would just be to only try to answer a few each day and > > leave the rest sitting in the not memorized pile. But that somehow > > feels untidy. > > Why do you say that? It's the surest and most elegant way to spread things > out.
I suppose I like the feeling of getting the ticker to zero. By manually just memorizing a few each day I would have to keep track of how many new ones to go through each day. Not a big deal, as big deals go. > > It does not set the initial easiness factor, but rather the initial > > interval. I see. So if I randomly graded something a 5 to start out, and when it came around for real and I got it correct, the next interval would be much larger than if the card had started out with a 1. Correct? Thank you so much Peter and all who help with Mnemosyne. It has been a great blessing in my life. BKh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
