On Sunday 17 May 2009 06:52:31 pm bkh wrote: > > > I guess the > > > alternative would just be to only try to answer a few each day and > > > leave the rest sitting in the not memorized pile. But that somehow > > > feels untidy. > > > > Why do you say that? It's the surest and most elegant way to spread > > things out. > > I suppose I like the feeling of getting the ticker to zero. By > manually just memorizing a few each day I would have to keep track of > how many new ones to go through each day. Not a big deal, as big > deals go.
Well, that track keeping does not need to be very accurate. Whether it's 10 or 15 won't make a big difference. The exact number you do per day will probably also depend on how difficult the material is, how tired you are, ... > > > It does not set the initial easiness factor, but rather the initial > > > interval. > > I see. So if I randomly graded something a 5 to start out, and when > it came around for real and I got it correct, the next interval would > be much larger than if the card had started out with a 1. Correct? Yep. > Thank you so much Peter and all who help with Mnemosyne. It has been > a great blessing in my life. My pleasure! Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
