Thanks Peter, that's really useful to know that. I've done some more cards and now they seem to be operating by that principle. I think maybe that the first few cards I had, had only just been re-learned after a lapse, and so there is some other overriding bit that said the new interval had to be equivalent to the scheduled interval, not the actual interval.
Anyway I think I'll go down the holding the space bar route all the same. Although I'll probably forget a lot of cards in between now and the next repetition, it should space out my cards a lot more, and I'll be able to start over with a much lighter study load. M. On Mar 28, 3:23 pm, Oisín <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 March 2011 04:57, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Here's the relevant code: > > > if new_grade == 2 or new_grade == 3: > > if actual_interval <= scheduled_interval: > > new_interval = actual_interval * item.easiness > > else: > > new_interval = scheduled_interval > > > if new_grade == 4: > > new_interval = actual_interval * item.easiness > > > if new_grade == 5: > > if actual_interval < scheduled_interval: > > new_interval = scheduled_interval # Avoid spacing. > > else: > > new_interval = actual_interval * item.easiness > > Ah, that's good to know. So if you're coming back to something after a long > period, the best thing to do is to mark everything correctly remembered with > a 5? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
