I would strongly recommend NOT to import automatic descriptions as manual descriptions into Wikidata. Automatic descriptions change when the data changes, new data is added, or the algorithm improves. I would prefer manual descriptions done by humans, for the comparatively small number of items that are hard to auto-describe, and use (properly cached) automated descriptions for everything else.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 6:36 PM Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7 Mar 2015 09:13, "Magnus Manske" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > May I use this as a shameless plug for my automatic description API: > > http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=265 > > > > It scores a 9 in the Hemmingway app for Nietzsche, as opposed to the 22 > for the English Wikipedia initial paragraph: > > Thanks Magnus > Was hoping this would be the case and you would confirm that :-) > > I personally would be very keen to get this into Wikidata via a bot. What > are the blockers for doing that? What has the discussion been around that > so far? > > > > https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc/?q=Q9358&lang=&mode=long&links=text&redlinks=&format=html&get_infobox=yes&infobox_template= > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:38 AM Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> What's the scientific background of hemingwayapp? I don't see anything > >> on their website. There is no one-size-fits-all readability algo for > >> English, as far as I know. > >> > >> Nemo > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mobile-l mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mobile-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
