On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Denton River wrote: > Its been a long time since i have done a jobb without using sessions. I would > really like to have this feature included in the kit im using and i think > alot of developers are with me on this one. What I don't understand is *why*. Why can't you use to independent pieces of software: one for templates and the other for sessions that work perfectly well together (or seperately)? I personally prefer smaller, more easily udnerstandable pieces to large, complex, feature-bloated software. - Paul
- Re: was Re: template kit..... - now session hand... Ian Kallen
- Re: was Re: template kit..... - now session ... Greg Cope
- RE: was Re: template kit..... - now sess... Gerald Richter
- Re: was Re: template kit..... - now... Leon Brocard
- RE: was Re: template kit..... - now... brian moseley
- RE: was Re: template kit..... -... Perrin Harkins
- RE: was Re: template kit..... -... brian moseley
- RE: was Re: template kit..... -... Jeffrey W. Baker
- RE: was Re: template kit..... -... Perrin Harkins
- Re: was Re: template kit..... - now session hand... Drew Taylor
- Re: template kit..... Paul J. Lucas
- Re: template kit..... Billy Donahue
- Re: template kit..... Tom Brown
- Re: template kit..... Greg Cope
- Re: template kit..... Erich L. Markert
- Re: template kit..... brian moseley
- Re: template kit..... Drew Taylor
- RE: template kit..... Denton River
- Re: template kit..... Joshua Chamas
- Re: template kit..... Denton River
- RE: template kit..... Gerald Richter