-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> > Its been a long time since i have done a jobb without using sessions.
> > I would really like to have this feature included in the kit im using
> > and i think alot of developers are with me on this one.
>
> What I don't understand is *why*. Why can't you use to independent
> pieces of software: one for templates and the other for sessions that
> work perfectly well together (or seperately)?
>
> I personally prefer smaller, more easily udnerstandable pieces to large,
> complex, feature-bloated software.
He's got a point there. What's wrong with bringing in some
pluggable session management? Uberpackages make maintenance
harder, and locks you in to using it for your whole app.
- --
"The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk."
Billy Donahue <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.8.11 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/
iD8DBQE5glkc+2VvpwIZdF0RAoD8AJ9jN+QibJXEDKwYk1HwaM+o7z/yagCfYIZp
Y0QCN6SPNHHsSDA4bTZnsRA=
=dIgV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
