Because rape isn't about sex at all and I for one
don't see Paul Weller as a violent rapist. Well, I
suppose had she went to the authorities four years ago
she could have had some bit of proof. Now, four years
later there isn't going to be much proof and it will
just be her word against his.
--- Jason Tinkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't buy it! I of course don't know the full
> story
> > but I would assume that it is a girl that he's had
> sex
> > with and she's probably mad now that he won't give
> her
> > the time of day.
>
> Why do you assume that she's lying? Why is the
> burden of proof for rape
> always on the victim?This is why a lot of rape cases
> go unreported, people
> make the woman feel like it was her fault, or that
> she made it up.
>
>
___________________________________________________________
> T O P I C A The Email You Want.
> http://www.topica.com/t/16
> Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite
> Topics
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
