I agree, it would be pretty hard to prove it now, unless the said person was
thinking of waiting until now to go for more money. Psychologically, if she
was infatuated with him, she would have done something then or said she was
carrying his baby. Me thinks it's a publicity stunt....
> Because rape isn't about sex at all and I for one
> don't see Paul Weller as a violent rapist. Well, I
> suppose had she went to the authorities four years ago
> she could have had some bit of proof. Now, four years
> later there isn't going to be much proof and it will
> just be her word against his.
> --- Jason Tinkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I don't buy it! I of course don't know the full
>> story
>>> but I would assume that it is a girl that he's had
>> sex
>>> with and she's probably mad now that he won't give
>> her
>>> the time of day.
>>
>> Why do you assume that she's lying? Why is the
>> burden of proof for rape
>> always on the victim?This is why a lot of rape cases
>> go unreported, people
>> make the woman feel like it was her fault, or that
>> she made it up.
>>
>>
> ___________________________________________________________
>> T O P I C A The Email You Want.
>> http://www.topica.com/t/16
>> Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite
>> Topics
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
> Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
>
>
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
