Al,

Welcome to it.  You're experiencing what most of us in the states have found... 
dealing with RSA a) is confusing as hell and b) blows dead moose.  They 
certainly haven't shifted gears to think about mod_ssl or OSS development in 
general.

For what it's worth, the first viable opportunity to drop my dependence on RSA 
algorithms will be where I break from them.  I hate their business practices, I 
hate their policies, and I hate their shortsighted mindset.

dsp

On Thursday, November 19, 1998 2:15 PM, Albert Etienne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
wrote:
> Maybe I haven't done my homework here, but.  I got everything installed
> and am trying to make sure I am in compliance with rsa's licensing for
> commercial profit use.
> As I read the agreement that came with the rsaref-2.0:
>
> WHAT YOU CAN (AND CANNOT) DO WITH RSAREF
>
>      1.   RSAREF is free for personal or corporate use under the
>           following conditions:
>
>           o    RSAREF, RSAREF applications, and services based on
>                RSAREF applications may not be sold.
>
>           o    You must give RSA the source code of any free RSAREF
>                application you plan to distribute or deploy within
>                your company. RSA will make these applications
>                available to the public, free of charge.
>
>      2.   RSAREF applications and services based on RSAREF
>           applications may be sold under the following conditions:
>
>           o    You must sign and return the RSAREF Commercial License
>                Agreement to RSA (call RSA for a copy of this
>                agreement). Remember, RSAREF is an unsupported toolkit.
>                If you are building an application to sell, you should
>                consider using fully supported libraries like RSA's
>                BSAFE or TIPEM SDK's.
>
> So I call them up and they want $2,500 for the developer software
> package and then I can discuss licensing.  WHAT!!!!!!!!   Are they
> kidding me?
> The person I spoke to said the software that I already have can not be
> licensed.  I can get Covalent Raven with a license for $357.
> What's the deal?  Is everybody using rsaref-2.0 under the radar?  Or am
> I forced to use something like Raven?
>
> And I was feeling so good about getting this to work ;-)
>
> Ideas?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
> Official Support Mailing List               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to