I am doing exactly this. I contacted RSA to buy a license to use RSA for my ssl webserver. They told me that I needed to buy a commercial server as their pricing is not setup for small guys like me. I then asked them if I could use the "Advanced Crypto License" that came with RedHat Secure WebServer with my setup (Apache+ssl at the time, now mod_ssl) and they told me this was fine. I contacted RedHat and they told me that they were including the "Advanced Crypto License" with the server. I ordered the RedHat product, and just popped it on the shelf. By the way, the server is available from www.cheapbytes.com for only $79 Dan Roscigno InterSoft Solutions, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://issbase.com > were to purchase a commercial solution, shelve it, then use that license in our > own (individual) mod_ssl package? We still have only one RSA implimentation > running, and we have a single RSA license. That way, RSA has their licensing > fees. > > Logically, that make sense to me, but US law only makes sense on rare > occasions. > dsp > > On Friday, November 20, 1998 1:16 AM, Preston Brown [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > wrote: > > Basically, RSA has discontinued all support for their rsaref stuff, and > > they wish it would just go away. At least, this is how they are making it > > appear to the outside world. > > > > To really use RSA encryption in the US, you have to go with a third party > > solution, such as Red Hat Secure Web Server, Roxen, Stronghold, Raven, > > etc. etc. etc. > > ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/ Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
