Just a pondering here, but in the -spirit- of the law (and probably not the letter), and given the fact that I'm not a lawyer, what if we (US developers) were to purchase a commercial solution, shelve it, then use that license in our own (individual) mod_ssl package? We still have only one RSA implimentation running, and we have a single RSA license. That way, RSA has their licensing fees. Logically, that make sense to me, but US law only makes sense on rare occasions. dsp On Friday, November 20, 1998 1:16 AM, Preston Brown [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Basically, RSA has discontinued all support for their rsaref stuff, and > they wish it would just go away. At least, this is how they are making it > appear to the outside world. > > To really use RSA encryption in the US, you have to go with a third party > solution, such as Red Hat Secure Web Server, Roxen, Stronghold, Raven, > etc. etc. etc. > > --- > -Preston Brown > Red Hat Software, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/ > Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/ Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
