On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Terrence Brannon wrote: > >I also tend to agree with him that Mail::Box is a bit over-engineered in>the OO department. Do you _really_ need _eleven_ classes for >Mail::Message::Field, which in turn are presumably used by the _nine_> >Mail::Message::Head classes? > maybe you should ask him on the Mail::Box mailing list. Well, he's already chimed in on this discussion, so I know he's on this list ;)
Yes, but is this list the most appropriate place to discuss Mail::Box?
I think the Mail::Box list is more appropriate in that respect.
Liz
