On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > At 02:12 -0600 1/28/04, Dave Rolsky wrote: > >On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Terrence Brannon wrote: > > > >I also tend to agree with him that Mail::Box is a bit over-engineered in > >> >the OO department. Do you _really_ need _eleven_ classes for > >> >Mail::Message::Field, which in turn are presumably used by the _nine_ > > > >Mail::Message::Head classes? > > > maybe you should ask him on the Mail::Box mailing list. > >Well, he's already chimed in on this discussion, so I know he's on this > >list ;) > > Yes, but is this list the most appropriate place to discuss Mail::Box? > > I think the Mail::Box list is more appropriate in that respect.
Well, this all started with a discussion of an entirely different module ;) -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
