On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Bill Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think supporting options like "other" or "mixed" should resolve most > of these cases. Sure, automatic tools that use this field will be out > of luck, but that should be a fairly small minority. This is exactly what I mean. I think setting 'other' as the license should indicate that the developer is aware of this field and cares but that the available options don't fit. This is IMHO much better then nothing or 'unknown'. Gabor
