* "Dr.Ruud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-26T14:39:23] > That's up to the creator of the license pragma, > but it would most probably be defined as standing for: > "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the same terms as Perl itself. See > http://www.perl.com/perl/misc/Artistic.html";.
It just seems less than useful to require the loading of more code at execution time to stand in for a comment. Further, given that various packagers (Debian, etc) really really would like to see an explicit copyright in each file, it actually seems counterproductive, since authors may think that adding a 'use license' statement is sufficient. -- rjbs
