On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:53 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:13:24PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> >> I agree that the second point is a problem. I'd like to solve it by >> delegating to Software::License. Anything it knows about should be a >> valid choice. > > All that does it make it Someone Elses Problem while still not solving > the problem. As an example, Software::License doesn't appear to know > about the Microsoft or Python licences. Don't underestimate the power of making it someone else's problem though. By far the biggest gripe with M::B's implementation of the license stuff is that it's in M::B. Decoupling them would be good. > PS - sorry you're getting this twice Ken. It's because you CCed me on > your post to the mailing list, so the copy sent directly to me arrived > first, so the copy from the list got thrown away. And it's the copy I > get from the list which goes through a procmail recipe to insert a > Reply-To header. Please don't CC me on mailing list messages in the > future. I'll try to remember but I'll probably forget after this thread. -Ken
