On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:56 AM BC <bill.co...@alumni.unh.edu> wrote:
> The only thing I don't like is that it feels like I am squatting on > something fairly generic near the top of the name space. If I were to > push my one and only module down a level as: > > Class::Fault::Foobar > > would it be a faux pas if there is no Class/Fault.pm or anything else > at that second level? > There is no requirement or reason that each step of the module hierarchy needs to exist as a separate module. (Just imagine if that was needed for https://metacpan.org/pod/Acme::Working::Out::Dependencies::From::META::files::Will::Be::Wrong::At::Some::Point::Like::This::Module::For::Instance ) -Dan
