* This is the modus mailing list *

The main problem I see with this is that I believe, and I may be wrong,
that if a user configures his Webmail to retrieve additional Email
accounts such as yahoo.com and etc then those Emails are stored on the
Webmail Server not the POP3/IMAP4 server.

Ronnie


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Johnson
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 3:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> 
> 
> * This is the modus mailing list *
> 
> Specifically, what files are you so wanting to keep separate?
> 
> When webmail is configured for IMAP, message files never 
> leave the imap server until they are deleted. Your arguing 
> about a few very small contact/preference files?
> 
> Brad Johnson
>   Systems Administrator
>     Local Link Network Operations
>  
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronnie Franklin
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> 
> * This is the modus mailing list *
> 
> May work for you, but I specifically do NOT want my webmail 
> server to use a remote directory to store messages. That is 
> the one of the reasons that I setup a separate Webmail server.
> 
> If they make it so it can be configured to use whatever 
> directory you want then that is ok, if it is hard coded to 
> use the directories on the POP3/IMAP4 server then I vote NO!
> 
> It should be simple enough, at least for Vircom, to write a 
> utility that scans the primary server for valid Mailboxes and 
> compares it to the mailboxes on the webmail server and then 
> just delete those that don't exist on the main server.  Have 
> this scheduled inside of the Modus Console.
> 
> However, we still have the old issue of I can't enable 
> "delete not used mailboxes" for those that have the "don't 
> leave a copy on server" and are forwarded to another box! So 
> maybe it is tougher to write than I think :)
> 
> Ronnie
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Johnson
> > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:54 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > 
> > 
> > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > 
> > Not a problem Ronnie ... all that is needed is that the
> > webmail uses the same file/folder format as the mail server. 
> > This is the way it is now except for the default domain on 
> > the mail server. I'm asking for them to be exactly the same. 
> > Those running webmail on a separate server would see only a 
> > minor change in the current format.
> > 
> > A cleanup utility could be built into webmail and just not
> > used when webmail is installed on the same server as Modus. 
> > 
> > Brad Johnson
> >   Systems Administrator
> >     Local Link Network Operations
> >  
> >  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronnie Franklin
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:11 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > 
> > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > 
> > Brad,
> > 
> > The only problem with using the inbox for webmail storage is
> > not all of us use Webmail on the same server as the actual 
> > mailserver.. So I don’t want that feature.  It would be 
> > better if there was some sort of scheduled cleanup utility.
> > 
> > Ronnie
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> > > Behalf Of Brad Johnson
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:07 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > > 
> > > 
> > > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > > 
> > > Actually, you'd be doing all of us and yourself a favor 
> by making it 
> > > IMAP only. IMAP solves so many current issues. I can't 
> think of one 
> > > reason to have Webmail use POP3 (I'd like to hear some) short of 
> > > having a mail server that doesn't support IMAP (which 
> isn't the case 
> > > with Modus).
> > > 
> > > I would also ask the following ...
> > > 
> > > Please, PLEASE, PLEASE make the new Webmail utilize the users 
> > > mailbox directory for Webmail File storage. Each mailbox has a 
> > > mailbox directory that is absolutely unused with the exception of 
> > > holding the "inbox" directory (or other IMAP folders if IMAP is 
> > > used). If user files are kept in a "Webmail" folder in 
> the mailbox 
> > > directory these files are deleted automatically upon 
> mailbox expiry 
> > > or mailbox deletion. Having files for the same use kept in two 
> > > different places is just WRONG! (back me up guys).
> > > 
> > > Brad Johnson
> > >   Systems Administrator
> > >     Local Link Network Operations
> > >  
> > >  
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> > > Behalf Of Michaël Gaudette
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:21 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > > 
> > > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > > 
> > > No no!!!
> > > 
> > > I have to be really careful about what I say here, I see 
> :-) There 
> > > is NO plan to drop IMAP support!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------
> > > Michaël Gaudette, P.Eng., M.B.A.
> > > Product Manager
> > > Vircom Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > > Behalf Of Robert D. Maynard
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:19 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > > > 
> > > > Does that mean that you will be dropping IMAP support?
> > > > 
> > > > -Robert Maynard
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > > Behalf Of Michaël Gaudette
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 1:46 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > > > 
> > > > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > You are right, it has been brought up before and we've made this
> > > > part of our "new Webmail" specification.  We'll make our 
> > new Webmail
> > > > more popup-blocker friendly.  Actually we'll make it a lot
> > > > "everything"-friendly.
> > > > 
> > > > And it'll be given free of charge as part of our product
> > to people
> > > > with active support plans.  So, in effect, it will be a
> > free webmail
> > > > that reads from POP3 :-)
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > -------------------------------------
> > > > Michaël Gaudette, P.Eng., M.B.A.
> > > > Product Manager
> > > > Vircom Inc.
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > > > Behalf Of Customer Support
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 1:49 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: [Modus] Feature Request for WebMail
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > * This is the modus mailing list *
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > >  I think this has been brought up before but let me 
> second the 
> > > > > request.  I think WebMail should be reworked to not popup
> > > a window
> > > > > to compose a new message.  It causes too much confusion
> > > with popup
> > > > > blockers these days.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I also ran into a problem with a user that was 
> furious with us. 
> > > > > They took a long time to write a message and when they
> > > finally went
> > > > > to hit send they got an error saying the session timed
> > > out and they
> > > > > lost the message.  Is webmail using sessions to keep track of 
> > > > > things?  If so, it appears the timeouts are set too low.
> > > > > 
> > > > > -------------------------
> > > > > Anthony DePinto
> > > > > Network Manager
> > > > > Internet Data Management, Inc.
> > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Phone: 330-707-0432 x100 Fax: 330-707-0433
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > **
> > > > > To unsubscribe, send an Email to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > > > > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > **
> > > > To unsubscribe, send an Email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > > > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > **
> > > > To unsubscribe, send an Email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > > > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > **
> > > To unsubscribe, send an Email to: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > **
> > > To unsubscribe, send an Email to: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > **
> > To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the 
> > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > 
> > 
> > **
> > To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the 
> > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> > 
> 
> 
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> 
> 
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> 


**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.

Reply via email to