On 13/06/14 Charlie Brady said: > That's great for you. If I were working alone, then perhaps I would do the > same. But I am working in a corporate situation where those choices are > not mine to make.
As am I. The assumption that we can simply change our platform always amazes me. > I am not asking sri to support or debug insane configurations. I am just > asking that he not remove a perfectly good CGI implementation just because > some people use insane apache configurations. CGI solves a particular class of problem in a perfectly good, language agnostic manner. Adding persistent services in place of those CGIs where none is needed actually increases deployment complexity. I thought we liked simple. I'm not using Mojo for a public website, I'm using it for less frequently accessed, private services in a server management layer. If CGI solves my problem, why should I care if someone ignorant of the problems that I must solve has decided to deprecate it? Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
