[BTW, the Subject is ironic - Request URI *is* being parsed correctly in CGI mode. OP had a broken suexec module in apache which didn't correctly implement CGI.]
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > If you want to use the latest version of Mojolicious, then surely you > can install Mojo::Server::CGI from a separate distribution. If Mojo::Server::CGI becomes abandonware, then Mojo::Server::CGI may not actually work with the latest version of Mojolicious. With the current bundling, the test harnesses ensure that it will work. > Or if you can't install new modules, then you probably shouldn't try to > upgrade Mojolicious either. Continuing to use old versions of Mojolicious is deprecated. And also undesirable because lots of wonderful new stuff is coming with new versions of Mojolicious. > I'm trying to understand why you're objecting. Help? I can't speak for Michael Soulier, but I've tried to explain myself above. But I should shut up. I see from IRC logs that some people think it offensive for me to say "Please do not remove CGI - it is very useful to me". I'm sorry - no offense is intended. I just want to be able to use latest Mojolicious - within the constraints imposed upon me. --- Charlie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
