Hey, On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Michael Sync <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay.. Sure. I will create something "PHONE" so we can use #if PHONE.. :)
I find WP7 more descriptive. After all, Cecil could run on Android at some point, and should work with MonoTouch as well :) So I think building for WP7 should define CF,SILVERLIGHT,WP7. Building for MonoTouch should only define SILVERLIGHT (even if it's not strictly exact). Android should be fine. > In that case, Shall we make different tests for WP7? What should we do to > check whether Cecil is actually working fine or not? We should definitely have something for that. It would be cool to be able to reuse a subset of the existing tests. But it's a tedious task. We could go on a case by case basis. If when working with Silverlight or WP7, we find an issue, we should of course write a regression test. If the issue is specific to SL or WP7, we had them to a VS Unit test suite, if not, we put it in the core test suite. That's how I suggest we go for now, especially as WP7 is still very blurry, and things could change rapidly. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/mono-cecil/subscribe?hl=en
