Hi Jb, Okay. Got it. So, we are not going to have any test for Silverlight and Silverlight for Phone 7 for now.
I have WP7 code running.. Do you want me to check-in? Or, Will you create a conditional for WP7 and modified in two places and check-in? So, we can have official version. What do you think? Thanks and Best Regards, Michael Sync Don't go the way life takes you. Take life the way you go http://michaelsync.net On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Michael Sync <[email protected]> wrote: > > Okay.. Sure. I will create something "PHONE" so we can use #if PHONE.. > :) > > I find WP7 more descriptive. After all, Cecil could run on Android at > some point, and should work with MonoTouch as well :) > > So I think building for WP7 should define CF,SILVERLIGHT,WP7. > Building for MonoTouch should only define SILVERLIGHT (even if it's > not strictly exact). Android should be fine. > > > In that case, Shall we make different tests for WP7? What should we do to > > check whether Cecil is actually working fine or not? > > We should definitely have something for that. It would be cool to be > able to reuse a subset of the existing tests. But it's a tedious task. > We could go on a case by case basis. If when working with Silverlight > or WP7, we find an issue, we should of course write a regression test. > If the issue is specific to SL or WP7, we had them to a VS Unit test > suite, if not, we put it in the core test suite. > > That's how I suggest we go for now, especially as WP7 is still very > blurry, and things could change rapidly. > > -- > Jb Evain <[email protected]> > > -- > -- > mono-cecil > > Subscription settings: > http://groups.google.com/group/mono-cecil/subscribe?hl=en > -- -- mono-cecil
