Hi,
I just looked at today's IRC log, and saw a discussion about making a
"automate commit" command.
Isn't this going a bit far? Soon, we will have automate commands for
all "normal" commands if we continue like this. Isn't that getting a
bit ridiculous, not to mention the risks involved, like having to
update the same command in two places all the time?
I dunno what the solution is. Maybe have stdio work with non-automate
commands as well, and having all commands be able to output stdio-
specific data that would be more oriented for scripts, as well as
human readable output, all depending on how the command was called.
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
