I don't think it's violation of contract. We made a contract with
Novell. I don't think Attatchmate has an obligation to uphold the
contracts Novell put in place.

Justin Hansen

On May 17, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Natalia Portillo <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> This all smells like a flagrant violation of contract.
>
> We have contracted 1 full year of support and updates, and unlimited working 
> time of the last version we get in that year.
>
> Using the 30-day refund is not an option, neither it is for lastest MonoTouch 
> and MonoDroid versions to stop working and activating.
>
> Attachmate must provide a solution (a refund PLUS an activation-less version 
> or giving all the IP and contracts to Miguel's company).
>
> Many of us are start-ups that have spent a lot on the licenses, in the hope 
> of the full year contract, and not all would be able to spend the money twice 
> (Attachmate + Miguel).
>
> This is not just bad news, Attachmate is dooming a lot of us to the bankrupt 
> or the absolute loss of competitiveness.
>
> El 16/05/2011, a las 22:22, Karl Heinz Brehme Arredondo escribió:
>
>> Was just an idea to them, I don't know If their're watching and without
>> ideas lol
>>
>> On 16/05/11 17:53, "Dimitris Tavlikos" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> If Attachmate was so noble, we would not be having these discussions now.
>>> ;)
>>>
>>> Dimitris Tavlikos
>>> Software Developer
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Twitter: @dtavlikos
>>> Blog: http://software.tavlikos.com
>>>
>>> 16 ??? 2011, 23:49, ?/? Karl Heinz Brehme Arredondo
>>> <[email protected]> ??????:
>>>
>>>> At least, Attachmate could DONATE MonoTouch and MonoDroid for his
>>>> intellectual owners/creators and transfer licenses. So they can work in
>>>> new things and give us support...
>>>>
>>>> On 16/05/11 17:43, "JohnnyNoMates" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 3 weeks? Where did you see that the new software would be available in
>>>>> 3
>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/So-what-happens-now-tp3527335p352
>>>>> 73
>>>>> 82.html
>>>>> Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MonoTouch mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MonoTouch mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MonoTouch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iF4EAREIAAYFAk3SgVkACgkQv/wfOsykIRQACQD9ESCtXkSaNPyStm2GK/qaIh5j
> PhZrSEsUAgv7KYKpbogA/AqXFLgzZDUtWY7G8QPGNbkaJcFWPGObt5oEZcLY/YqH
> =EfeG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> MonoTouch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
_______________________________________________
MonoTouch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch

Reply via email to