They cant do that, as releasing any statement will be used against them in any action. Much easier for them NOT to say anything. Imagine a company publicly stating the product is dead, that is all the evidence needed to win a case of this magnitude.

On 5/17/2011 10:27 AM, Demis Bellot wrote:
If Attachmate is the legal entity who are in now in possession of Novell's assets and liabilities then it only makes sense they're responsible in fulfilling all Novell's prior obligations, including the support that has been paid for.

If they want to nullify the contract, then I imagine we should all be re-imbursed for lack of execution.

Either way, we should be given the courtesy of a formal statement to MonoTouch/MonoDroid customers.

Regards,
Demis

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Justin Hansen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I don't think it's violation of contract. We made a contract with
    Novell. I don't think Attatchmate has an obligation to uphold the
    contracts Novell put in place.

    Justin Hansen

    On May 17, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Natalia Portillo
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA256
    >
    > This all smells like a flagrant violation of contract.
    >
    > We have contracted 1 full year of support and updates, and
    unlimited working time of the last version we get in that year.
    >
    > Using the 30-day refund is not an option, neither it is for
    lastest MonoTouch and MonoDroid versions to stop working and
    activating.
    >
    > Attachmate must provide a solution (a refund PLUS an
    activation-less version or giving all the IP and contracts to
    Miguel's company).
    >
    > Many of us are start-ups that have spent a lot on the licenses,
    in the hope of the full year contract, and not all would be able
    to spend the money twice (Attachmate + Miguel).
    >
    > This is not just bad news, Attachmate is dooming a lot of us to
    the bankrupt or the absolute loss of competitiveness.
    >
    > El 16/05/2011, a las 22:22, Karl Heinz Brehme Arredondo escribió:
    >
    >> Was just an idea to them, I don't know If their're watching and
    without
    >> ideas lol
    >>
    >> On 16/05/11 17:53, "Dimitris Tavlikos" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>
    >>> If Attachmate was so noble, we would not be having these
    discussions now.
    >>> ;)
    >>>
    >>> Dimitris Tavlikos
    >>> Software Developer
    >>> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>> Twitter: @dtavlikos
    >>> Blog: http://software.tavlikos.com
    >>>
    >>> 16 ??? 2011, 23:49, ?/? Karl Heinz Brehme Arredondo
    >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    ??????:
    >>>
    >>>> At least, Attachmate could DONATE MonoTouch and MonoDroid for his
    >>>> intellectual owners/creators and transfer licenses. So they
    can work in
    >>>> new things and give us support...
    >>>>
    >>>> On 16/05/11 17:43, "JohnnyNoMates" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> 3 weeks? Where did you see that the new software would be
    available in
    >>>>> 3
    >>>>> weeks?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> View this message in context:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/So-what-happens-now-tp3527335p352
    >>>>> 73
    >>>>> 82.html
    >>>>> Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
    >>>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>>> MonoTouch mailing list
    >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>> MonoTouch mailing list
    >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> MonoTouch mailing list
    >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
    >
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
    > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
    >
    > iF4EAREIAAYFAk3SgVkACgkQv/wfOsykIRQACQD9ESCtXkSaNPyStm2GK/qaIh5j
    > PhZrSEsUAgv7KYKpbogA/AqXFLgzZDUtWY7G8QPGNbkaJcFWPGObt5oEZcLY/YqH
    > =EfeG
    > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    > _______________________________________________
    > MonoTouch mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
    _______________________________________________
    MonoTouch mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch





_______________________________________________
MonoTouch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
_______________________________________________
MonoTouch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch

Reply via email to