-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
El 17/05/2011, a las 15:20, Justin Hansen escribió: > I don't think it's violation of contract. We made a contract with > Novell. I don't think Attatchmate has an obligation to uphold the > contracts Novell put in place. Don't know in your exact country, but in the whole European Union, it does. > Justin Hansen > > On May 17, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Natalia Portillo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> This all smells like a flagrant violation of contract. >> >> We have contracted 1 full year of support and updates, and unlimited working >> time of the last version we get in that year. >> >> Using the 30-day refund is not an option, neither it is for lastest >> MonoTouch and MonoDroid versions to stop working and activating. >> >> Attachmate must provide a solution (a refund PLUS an activation-less version >> or giving all the IP and contracts to Miguel's company). >> >> Many of us are start-ups that have spent a lot on the licenses, in the hope >> of the full year contract, and not all would be able to spend the money >> twice (Attachmate + Miguel). >> >> This is not just bad news, Attachmate is dooming a lot of us to the bankrupt >> or the absolute loss of competitiveness. >> >> El 16/05/2011, a las 22:22, Karl Heinz Brehme Arredondo escribió: >> >>> Was just an idea to them, I don't know If their're watching and without >>> ideas lol >>> >>> On 16/05/11 17:53, "Dimitris Tavlikos" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If Attachmate was so noble, we would not be having these discussions now. >>>> ;) >>>> >>>> Dimitris Tavlikos >>>> Software Developer >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Twitter: @dtavlikos >>>> Blog: http://software.tavlikos.com >>>> >>>> 16 ??? 2011, 23:49, ?/? Karl Heinz Brehme Arredondo >>>> <[email protected]> ??????: >>>> >>>>> At least, Attachmate could DONATE MonoTouch and MonoDroid for his >>>>> intellectual owners/creators and transfer licenses. So they can work in >>>>> new things and give us support... >>>>> >>>>> On 16/05/11 17:43, "JohnnyNoMates" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 3 weeks? Where did you see that the new software would be available in >>>>>> 3 >>>>>> weeks? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/So-what-happens-now-tp3527335p352 >>>>>> 73 >>>>>> 82.html >>>>>> Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> MonoTouch mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> MonoTouch mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MonoTouch mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) >> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org >> >> iF4EAREIAAYFAk3SgVkACgkQv/wfOsykIRQACQD9ESCtXkSaNPyStm2GK/qaIh5j >> PhZrSEsUAgv7KYKpbogA/AqXFLgzZDUtWY7G8QPGNbkaJcFWPGObt5oEZcLY/YqH >> =EfeG >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> MonoTouch mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iF4EAREIAAYFAk3ShG4ACgkQv/wfOsykIRTuPgD/XAwvHqpTZ7Mr17F9e4pKMWed 4pOF6HYVCNmgGGFu/ScA/2Qqo3O7D5GCM3cAKa6ELnEBItiFqrfulsdrlc/6Km13 =6dye -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
