I confess I have the same concerns over JxLib - if it were 1.3 and had more end-user-friendly graphics, I would be delighted to adopt it for my clients. I am no designer, if I were, I would offer to help out....
Good luck Lee On 8 July 2011 08:17, stratboy <[email protected]> wrote: > Jonathan, is JxLib based on mootools 1.3? It seems 1.2 > > If I can, I'd like to spend 2 words about your project. I think it's > probably really good, but I didn't tried it yet. I'm still trying to > choose the right one for me. > Anyway, I'm a programmer (see also http://reghellin.com/milkbox :P) > but ALSO a designer. Don't know if I'm more a designer or a > programmer. I'm not a native of any of the 2. > BUT, as a designer, I must say that your app simply do not have a good > theme. And even if I see you can change it, and I guess one can > probably customize it, I think that if you want to catch more > 'customers', you should 1. improve the default theme, 2. clearly show > it in the home, maybe with screenshots, 3. clearly specify (if > possible) that one could customize it, and how. About this last point > anyway, I think that, as far as you come up with a good default theme > (like extjs? :P) probably there's no really need of any change/ > customize system: you could concentrate solely on the other features > of your framework. > > Please excuse me, I wrote these things with the meaning of help. > Elso excuse me if my english's not so good. > > Have a nice day > > > > On Jul 8, 7:17 am, Jonathan Bomgardner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andre, > > > > I was just wondering if you've taken an extensive look at JxLib? As one > of > > the developers of the library I'm always looking for feedback (both > positive > > and negative). If you have, what did you think? What are some areas that > you > > found lacking or that need to be improved before you would use it or > > recommend it to others? > > > > Thanks, > > Jon > > JxLib Developer >
