> > You mean - my own mootools page? ;-)
No, look the link below. > It seems like the only thing that can be agreed upon is that there needs to > be a redesign. Yes, hence the link below. *https://github.com/fakedarren/mootools-website*<https://github.com/fakedarren/mootools-website> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not saying that good design isn't important. And, frankly, I loved > those little kwicks on the original Mootools.net as much as anyone. But when > I compare it to the current MooTools site which is somewhat underspoken and > the design for the new site which is also somewhat subdued, it doesn't > bother me that there's not shit flying around the page just because we can. > Anyone remember > this<http://www.ericmmartin.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/jquery_homepage-500.jpg> > ? > > [image: jquery_homepage-500.jpg] > > When I talk about Apache's site it's not because I like it - I don't! - but > rather to say that good community and good documentation and good code are > about a billion times more important. The current MooTools site is simple, > easy to find your way around, and easy to use. I agree it could use a little > more information in places (the home page, imho, could feature some demos, > featured sites, etc), but I disagree that MooTools.net needs to itself be a > design showcase for the framework. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:47 AM, RipTheJacker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree with some of the others about the old, more flashy and >> friendly, design. That's what initially brought me to using MooTools >> over other frameworks out there. Apache is a poor example. Like >> someone earlier said, that market is not the same as with MooTools. >> Also, plenty of tools target toward developers have nice designs >> anyway. Look at Nginx, or the Ruby community, or the website for our >> President (which influenced better design in every other candidate's >> site). Design is as important a tool to get your point across as >> documentation. >> >> >> On Sep 29, 2:48 am, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > At this point I am convinced Aaron gets paid for all the lobbying he >> does >> > for Apache. >> > >
