"...I think we are losing focus from important things..." The focus?!
A good goal for a developers is to find, with a few click, what he is looking for. I like very much the php example at the the end of the function page. Since 1998 when i started with php i found all the basic (and good) example to work with a new function. Simple and quickly In my little experience... Always when i need to work i start first from the example page (a i find what i need). I don't need to follow any newsgroup to learn about php. This is for me the most important direction to follow for the future. So i suggest, if it's possible, to improve the actual (good demos area) with a section dedicate to all the people that want to give a contribute with extra example. Many thanks for your attention Cristiano On 29 Set, 21:57, hartum <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone* > > I think we are losing focus from important things. > > 1º) we should define de data tree estructure: > > Example: > - Home > - Downloads > |__ Core Builder > |__ More Builder > |__ GitHub repository etc.... > |__ Etc.. > - Docs > |__ Core > | |__ Array > | |__ String > | |__ Etc.... > |__ More > - Forge > - Blog > - Demos > > 2º) create some wireframes, based on usability. > As web developers I think the most important sections are: > - Documentation > - Demos > - Forge > - Blog > - Download > - Others > > 3º) create some designs based on wireframes. It could be gray and > beautiful > ;-)http://dribbble.com/shots/279929-Is-this-too-apple-ish-/attachments/1... > > Finally I agree that effects and DOM manipulation is the gateway for > this amazing framework > but we are looking at the finger, and not at the moon. > > *sorry for my terrible english. :-S > > On 29 sep, 17:43, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that good design isn't important. And, frankly, I loved those > > little kwicks on the original Mootools.net as much as anyone. But when I > > compare it to the current MooTools site which is somewhat underspoken and > > the design for the new site which is also somewhat subdued, it doesn't > > bother me that there's not shit flying around the page just because we can. > > Anyone remember > > this<http://www.ericmmartin.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/jquer...> > > ? > > > [image: jquery_homepage-500.jpg] > > > When I talk about Apache's site it's not because I like it - I don't! - but > > rather to say that good community and good documentation and good code are > > about a billion times more important. The current MooTools site is simple, > > easy to find your way around, and easy to use. I agree it could use a little > > more information in places (the home page, imho, could feature some demos, > > featured sites, etc), but I disagree that MooTools.net needs to itself be a > > design showcase for the framework. > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:47 AM, RipTheJacker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree with some of the others about the old, more flashy and > > > friendly, design. That's what initially brought me to using MooTools > > > over other frameworks out there. Apache is a poor example. Like > > > someone earlier said, that market is not the same as with MooTools. > > > Also, plenty of tools target toward developers have nice designs > > > anyway. Look at Nginx, or the Ruby community, or the website for our > > > President (which influenced better design in every other candidate's > > > site). Design is as important a tool to get your point across as > > > documentation. > > > > On Sep 29, 2:48 am, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > At this point I am convinced Aaron gets paid for all the lobbying he > > > > does > > > > for Apache.
