I don't think it is sane to start work if we don't agree on the principles. For now it looks like we think about different sites for different people. ;)
cheers, On 29 Wrz, 18:19, Arian Stolwijk <[email protected]> wrote: > > You mean - my own mootools page? ;-) > > No, look the link below. > > > It seems like the only thing that can be agreed upon is that there needs to > > be a redesign. > > Yes, hence the link below. > > *https://github.com/fakedarren/mootools-website*<https://github.com/fakedarren/mootools-website> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not saying that good design isn't important. And, frankly, I loved > > those little kwicks on the original Mootools.net as much as anyone. But when > > I compare it to the current MooTools site which is somewhat underspoken and > > the design for the new site which is also somewhat subdued, it doesn't > > bother me that there's not shit flying around the page just because we can. > > Anyone remember > > this<http://www.ericmmartin.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/jquer...> > > ? > > > [image: jquery_homepage-500.jpg] > > > When I talk about Apache's site it's not because I like it - I don't! - but > > rather to say that good community and good documentation and good code are > > about a billion times more important. The current MooTools site is simple, > > easy to find your way around, and easy to use. I agree it could use a little > > more information in places (the home page, imho, could feature some demos, > > featured sites, etc), but I disagree that MooTools.net needs to itself be a > > design showcase for the framework. > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:47 AM, RipTheJacker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I agree with some of the others about the old, more flashy and > >> friendly, design. That's what initially brought me to using MooTools > >> over other frameworks out there. Apache is a poor example. Like > >> someone earlier said, that market is not the same as with MooTools. > >> Also, plenty of tools target toward developers have nice designs > >> anyway. Look at Nginx, or the Ruby community, or the website for our > >> President (which influenced better design in every other candidate's > >> site). Design is as important a tool to get your point across as > >> documentation. > > >> On Sep 29, 2:48 am, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > At this point I am convinced Aaron gets paid for all the lobbying he > >> does > >> > for Apache.
