I don't see how defending frameworks with lower code quality is a better use of a "dead" mailing list. If you're in the jQuery camp, there's no need to come here and flog Moo ; the unsubscribe instructions are easy to find. The discussion, anyway, is about jQuery's rise well before its supposed improvement, and you and I know that rise didn't happen because it was better, it happened because web designers could get it (mostly) and it fit with their hope that they wouldn't have to learn to -- eek --program. If you haven't encountered the "old crowd" hanging out on otherwise idle mailing lists yet, I don't know how long you've been developing. The same happens with all kinds of software, and trolling a defense of a more successful product isn't necessary. We get it. P.S. There are enough outstanding PRs (are some of them yours?) that it's clear that Moo needs to be forked, not updated. I myself use mini-frameworks and functional programming more now. Moo is what it is. And like other dominant crapware like VB and (in many ways) PHP, jQuery is what it is. You don't change something's quality by touting its improvement: Rick Ross is a much better MC than he used to be, and Miley can sing a little now, but they're still popular crap.
> jQuery is BY FAR the crappiest Big Thing in circulation right now, I think you've been away from it for a while. jQuery has great browser support and activity. It's also pushing adoption of newer JS features by being modern first in their 2.0 and allowing smaller builds w/ custom builds to boot. I get that you have a problem with it's API, but its support, activity, community involvement is top notch (they even have TC39 representation). Instead of venting on jQuery to a dead mailing list you could try contributing to MooTools or jQuery to make them better, maybe get MooTools to version bump to support IE11 while you're at it. - JDD On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> wrote: > The decline of MooTools rests on the MooTools core devs and no one --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MooTools Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MooTools Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. | ||
- [Moo] jQuery venting ! hazlema
- RE: [Moo] jQuery venting ! [email protected]
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Aaron Newton
- RE: [Moo] jQuery venting ! kangarolf
- RE: [Moo] jQuery venting ! [email protected]
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! John-David Dalton
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! John-David Dalton
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! John-David Dalton
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! [email protected]
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! [email protected]
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! John-David Dalton
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! [email protected]
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Aaron Newton
- Re: [Moo] jQuery venting ! Erik Cervin Edin
