Likewise, look forward to seeing the titles. Some very interesting points  
from Patrick and Rich too.
 
Wouldn't say there are "virtually no quads from before 1960 in collectors'  
hands", but they are rare compared to US numbers. As Rich said,  1940s 
posters from the UK, particularly wartime, are very  scarce because of paper 
shortages and rationing which continued  beyond the end of the war. Not to 
mention heavy bombing/destruction during the  war. Wartime posters were often 
printed on the back of other old  posters. The austerity that this engendered 
may well have persisted  into the 1950s, as rationing (food) only completely 
disappeared in  1954. Paper drives were encouraged by the government, where 
people and  businesses were encouraged to have paper collected for pulping  
and recycling (nothing is new!). It also strikes me that photos I've seen  
of smaller regional cinemas in the UK up to the 60s show very  little in the 
way of studio-issued posters - more commonly Front Of  House stills and 
hand-written posters. Perhaps someone can confirm  that impression I have. 
Certainly even when I started going to the cinema  in the late 60s, I seem to 
remember FOH stills more than posters - or  perhaps the area I grew up in was 
too provincial! I worked in a film  archive for a few years and know from 
some of the archived material that  cinema owners were quite fond of cutting 
up trade ads to use for  display from the 30s onwards - cheaper than real 
posters.
 
Pre-war the standard UK sizes equated to the US 3-sheet and 6-sheet  
(although perversely they were called 6-sheets and 12-sheets), and were  
presumably mostly pasted up, yet another reason why very  few survived. Having 
ploughed through quite a few UK and US  pressbooks for the same titles from the 
20s and 30s, it seems that vertical  "quads" existed for some titles, but very 
often these were actually  the US 1-sheet! Same is true for lobby cards. 
Before seeing examples of this, I  had no idea that US materials were used in 
the UK in this way.
 
As somewhat more of a guess, the UK is a comparatively small area, so  I 
would imagine that posters could be passed from cinema to cinema a  lot more 
easily along with the actual film prints. This would obviously mean  more 
wear and tear, and less opportunity for cinema owners to hang onto  them. I 
know that the film reels were passed around at quite a frequent  rate, as they 
tended to be booked on a weekly basis, and new prints  were very expensive 
to produce. This probably became less of an issue by  the time economic boom 
of the 60s came along. Even in the 60s though, I've  seen notes from 
desperate distributors pleading for quick return of promotional  materials due 
to 
shortage.  
  
Paul
_www.movieposterstudio.com_ (http://www.movieposterstudio.com/) 

 
In a message dated 22/04/2009 14:44:07 GMT Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

I will be listing a single owner collection of British Quads, beginning  
the 28th, and the collection contains a lot of older quads, and I am struck by 
 the fact that, in all my years in the hobby, I have seen just a tiny 
number of  quads from before 1960 (and even most titles from the early 1960s 
seem 
to  be many times more rare than their U.S. counterparts).
 
This collection contains 23 from the 1940s, 228 from the 1950s, 120 from  
the 1960s, and 116 from the 1970s to present!
 
I am hoping MoPo members (especially long time collectors/dealers, and  
even more so those from the U.K.) can weigh in on the following:
 
1) Am I correct in thinking that there are virtually no quads from before  
1960 in collectors' hands?
 
2) In all my years, I have personally only ever seen a handful  of pre-1960 
quads before viewing this collection; has anyone here seen any  substantial 
number of them?
 
3) If they are as rare as I have stated, WHY is that? I understand that  
pre-WWII paper from all European countries is super-scarce, but in all other  
European countries you can easily find just about every post WWII title. Why 
 is the U.K. different from the other countries? Is it that they had far 
fewer  cinemas?
 
Any light anyone here can shed on this will be greatly appreciated!
 
Bruce



 

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to