Isnt there is a whole school of thought that considers an
inscription or autograph on a poster almost like a kind of graffiti?
they say it detracts from a piece and lessens its value (production
stills or head shots are another animal, altogether, and im not
referring to them here).
best.
jeff
On Dec 10, 2009, at 5:32 AM, Michael B wrote:
just like the debates of LINEN vs, UNBACKED affecting values,
another debate is:
DOES AN AUTOGRAPH ADD VALUE TO AN ITEM?
most say, YES. MANY PAY SUPER-HIGH PREMIUM AMOUNTS for autographed
posters/cards.
am i in the minority or majority that prefer a poster not to have
an autograph? if an autograph is "To Elmo from Bette Davis", and
my name isn't Elmo.......
if a poster is in poor condition, but autographed, would it fetch
more than a VF grade?
thoughts?
michael
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
