many topics talk about the expensive posters.  this morning, i  just hung a 
900+ insert and removed MR. SKEFFINGTON from its  place......
 
BUT, BUT BUT---on that same wall, i have a 15.00 beauty:  THE  LONG DARK 
HALL.  I bought the os on ebay two years ago for  9.99, and the insert a few 
months later for 14.99.  an obscure great,  interesting film.  kinda like a 
less sophisticated film of WITNESS FOR THE  PROSECUTION.
 
last week i watched the EDGE OF DOOM.  Then, i looked on  bruce's site to 
see the image.  I was surprised to see how cheap  this poster was:  under 
10.00 OS poster!!!!  in fact, bruce last  sold it for 2.00.  had i seen the 
movie before that time, i might have gone  to 8.  lol.  not a pretty 
poster.......but i am sure the insert or  half might be better, although i have 
not 
seen any images of it.
 
QUESTION:  WHAT IS THE CHEAPEST POSTER THAT YOU OWN  AND 
ENJOY, that is truly undervalued in the  marketplace?
 
I WOULD LIKE TO FIND THE FOLLOWING CHEAPIES, WHICH TRULY ARE  CHEAP!!!!:  
   
THE  LONG DARK HALL – 1951, rex harrison (half only) 
TOMORROW  THE WORLD (insert or half)  (i paid about 40 for the OS this  
year--bruce) 
TOMORROW  IS FOREVER (half only)  (i paid 14.99 for the insert 5 years  
ago) 
SHADOW  ON THE WALL (half only)  (i paid 18or20 for the insert with 
shipping  this year 
from a MOPO dealer friend) 
THE  UNKNOWN MAN (half only)  (i paid 9.99 for the insert this year) 
EDGE  OF DOOM ---need to see image 
>>>>maybe  the dealers should list a few cheap posters on MOPO since ebay 
fees might be a  killer for these lesser titles. 
michael

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to