I agree 100%, Greg!  I have several window cards from the 30s with the theatre 
names and dates in the top area.  I love it.
Also, I have a half-sheet from the 1956-or-so Fox CinemaScope film, "Seven 
Cities of Gold."  On the back in pen is written "Joy Theater, Vicksburg."  I 
saw the film as a young teen at that theatre at that time.  So I realize that I 
own a poster that I actually  saw displayed while waiting for a ride after the 
movie---- almost 50 years before I obtained the poster...purely by chance!
The poster is worth maybe 15 or 20 bucks on line.  It's worth everything to me 
just to have it.  
 
Joe B in NOLA  (Praying for the cap to hold!)
 
PS-- A few years ago I was to going to move some inserts on Ebay.  A friend 
took the pictures I needed cropped and photo-shopped them.  He just didn't 
understand why they needed to look the way they did.   I used the un-cropped 
originals (which were good anyway) that  I had taken myself.
 
Joe


--- On Sat, 7/17/10, Greg <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Greg <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Scandal-plus cut, pressed washed, starched & dried....
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, July 17, 2010, 2:10 PM


Agreed. Give me a window card with the original theater imprint, and the poster 
goes from a nice bit of imagery to an iconic piece of American history. Stuff 
written on the back of posters...as long as it doesn't bleed through...often 
adds a bit of being in the that moment in time to the piece.
Greg Douglass
Toochis Morin wrote:
> I love posters that have the worn look. If I wanted them to look perfectly 
> new, I'd buy repros.  
> Many of mine are framed with the fold lines, etc.  I usually linenback and 
> restore if the poster is in dire need to restoration.
> 
> Toochis
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Bruce Hershenson <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Sat, July 17, 2010 9:11:34 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The Scandal-plus cut, pressed washed, starched & 
> dried....
> 
> I actually had one of my employees suggest to me that we should "punch up" 
> the images of items we sell, and I told him that we NEVER do that (he is new, 
> or he would have already known that). Of course, there is no way to know if 
> others feel the same way (at least until you get your package and compare the 
> item you get to the image you saw).
> 
> Bruce
> 
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Richard Evans <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     I thought the This Gun for Hire went beyond strong colours and
>     looked unflatteringly garish.
>     Presumably not a result of restoration judging by the listing,
>     but was it really actually that vibrant, or did the colour
>     reproduction exacerbate it online?
> 
>     On 17 Jul 2010, at 16:44, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
> 
>>     I personally agree with this. I didn't like the "make it look
>>     perfect" school of restoration even *BEFORE* the Haggard scandal
>>     broke.
>> 
>>     First, because the restorers were in effect hiding their
>>     restoration, making it impossible to see exactly what was done
>>     (and a long time pro like myself could spot some restoration that
>>     most amateurs would never see, creating a "fear of restoration"
>>     among many collectors).
>> 
>>     Second, because many of these items were *SO *restored that they
>>     looked almost like "recreations". I *LIKE *the items in my
>>     collection to show at least *SOME *signs of age, unless they are
>>     in truly mint unrestored condition, because that is part of the
>>     joy of owning an original, knowing that it survived all these
>>     years. If you want a perfect looking item, why not just get a
>>     reproduction? But don't take your "very good" condition and have
>>     someone make them look like new. If you *MUST *restore, why not
>>     simply do minimal restoration to the areas that most need it?
>> 
>>     Bruce
>> 
>>     On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM,
>>     glenndamato <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>         Regarding the Heritage auction: I do believe the fakes
>>         scandal hurt the hobby, plus many of the restored posters
>>         look like they were cut, bleached, washed, starched & dried.
>>         I'll take old Igor back anyday.......
>> 
>>                 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site
>>         at www.filmfan.com <http://www.filmfan.com>
>>                  
>>___________________________________________________________________
>>                      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>> 
>>               Send a message addressed
>>         to: [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>                    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>> 
>>            The author of this message is solely responsible for its
>>         content.
>> 
>> 
>>     Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>     <http://www.filmfan.com>
>> 
>>     ___________________________________________________________________
>> 
>>     How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>> 
>>     Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>> 
>>     In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>> 
>>     The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
> <http://www.filmfan.com>
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> 
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> 
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> 
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> 
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                         Send a message addressed to: 
[email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                      The author of this message is solely 
responsible for its content.





         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to