while I may have a small number of linenbacked posters in my collection, my 99.9% preference is unrestored posters

I'm not bothered by fold lines, small pieces out, tears etc. and I happily display posters whatever the condition is

too often restoration that I have gotten (from people I don't use anymore) is amateurish at best I once had a poster that was ripped in half vertically and the restorer didn't even match up the pieces before backing them. they were off at least 1/4 of an inch, making me wonder what kind of %...@%&* that moron was



At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, Toochis Morin wrote:
I love posters that have the worn look. If I wanted them to look perfectly new, I'd buy repros.

Many of mine are framed with the fold lines, etc. I usually linenback and restore if the poster is in dire need to restoration.

Toochis


From: Bruce Hershenson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, July 17, 2010 9:11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Scandal-plus cut, pressed washed, starched & dried....

I actually had one of my employees suggest to me that we should "punch up" the images of items we sell, and I told him that we NEVER do that (he is new, or he would have already known that). Of course, there is no way to know if others feel the same way (at least until you get your package and compare the item you get to the image you saw).

Bruce

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Richard Evans <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: I thought the This Gun for Hire went beyond strong colours and looked unflatteringly garish. Presumably not a result of restoration judging by the listing, but was it really actually that vibrant, or did the colour reproduction exacerbate it online?

On 17 Jul 2010, at 16:44, Bruce Hershenson wrote:

I personally agree with this. I didn't like the "make it look perfect" school of restoration even BEFORE the Haggard scandal broke.

First, because the restorers were in effect hiding their restoration, making it impossible to see exactly what was done (and a long time pro like myself could spot some restoration that most amateurs would never see, creating a "fear of restoration" among many collectors).

Second, because many of these items were SO restored that they looked almost like "recreations". I LIKE the items in my collection to show at least SOME signs of age, unless they are in truly mint unrestored condition, because that is part of the joy of owning an original, knowing that it survived all these years. If you want a perfect looking item, why not just get a reproduction? But don't take your "very good" condition and have someone make them look like new. If you MUST restore, why not simply do minimal restoration to the areas that most need it?

Bruce

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, glenndamato <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: Regarding the Heritage auction: I do believe the fakes scandal hurt the hobby, plus many of the restored posters look like they were cut, bleached, washed, starched & dried. I'll take old Igor back anyday.......

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at <http://www.filmfan.com>www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at <http://www.filmfan.com>www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at <http://www.filmfan.com>www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to