I think many will find this reply as confusing as the rest ... How can you say you got burned in this transaction, when the seller OFFERED YOU A REFUND, once you sent the poster back?
This response makes NO sense. What it sounds like is that you are choosing to keep it for a period of time, and then flipping it (wth an added markup, most likely). You are choosing to keep it. Can you please explain how you "got burned?" Using this logic, you are opting to burn yourself. And again-- what is the poster? Please provide a link. Why are you so secretive about this aspect, on a poster message board? -KL On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > not at all. > > it was never my intent to embarrass the mega-dealer-seller. my posting was > merely to get the seller to respond, if he were a MOPO member. the picture > of the poster on ebay looks near mint....even hard to see the studio folds. > > i was burnt and disappointed in this transaction......... > > i repeat: the picture of the poster on ebay looks mint....even hard to see > the studio folds. ....no hint of extra fold on the photo.......but > offensive in person. > > looks like i will take a hit on this one, because when i sell it, i will > disclose the defects. > > easy for those who don't get slapped to say to the other to turn the other > cheek. > > > > michael > > > > In a message dated 10/7/2011 4:56:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Fascinating is all I can say. > > This buyer who complained so loudly has now gone completely silent and > turned his mute button on. Why? > > And with still no links to this incorrectly described (4 4 4 folded) > poster, and no response to those that questioned, criticized and > commented on his premature outburst towards a seller who was/is > willing to work with him-- speaks volumes about this individual's own > integrity and transparency. > > I see he also occasionally lists a number of posters for sale on ebay, > with every color in the rainbow used in the descriptive fonts > (psychedelic trip?). Let's just hope that each and every flaw on those > posters have been accurately disclosed. I am willing to bet that there > are small imperfections that have not been seen and therefore, not > disclosed. > > And if someone found an undisclosed flaw and wanted to return a > purchased poster to him, would this seller pay for return shipping > and/or take a price reduction decided by the unhappy buyer? > > > > -KL > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Michael B <[email protected]> wrote: >> when a poster is "not as described" or has undisclosed defects, it should >> be >> the seller that paye the return postage? >> >> i am waiting for the seller to confirm this. >> >> i was happy to see that the seller read my posting on MOPO, and responded, >> but he needs to confirm that he will pay the return postage. >> >> michael >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >> ___________________________________________________________________ How to >> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: >> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF >> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com > ___________________________________________________________________ > How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List > > Send a message addressed to: [email protected] > In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L > > The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
