it was never my intent to embarrass the mega-dealer-seller. my
posting was merely to get the seller to respond, if he were a MOPO
member. the picture of the poster on ebay looks near mint....even
hard to see the studio folds.
Presumably a poor pic, and if you can't see the studio folds, that
would explain why you can't see the extra folds?
And not much of a hit surely?
Wasn't it 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4....$45 inc shipping?
Can understand getting wound up about these things, but surely it's
worth saving for the ones over $50?
On 7 Oct 2011, at 22:42, Michael B wrote:
not at all.
it was never my intent to embarrass the mega-dealer-seller. my
posting was merely to get the seller to respond, if he were a MOPO
member. the picture of the poster on ebay looks near mint....even
hard to see the studio folds.
i was burnt and disappointed in this transaction.........
i repeat: the picture of the poster on ebay looks mint....even hard
to see the studio folds. ....no hint of extra fold on the
photo.......but offensive in person.
looks like i will take a hit on this one, because when i sell it, i
will disclose the defects.
easy for those who don't get slapped to say to the other to turn the
other cheek.
michael
In a message dated 10/7/2011 4:56:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected]
writes:
Fascinating is all I can say.
This buyer who complained so loudly has now gone completely silent and
turned his mute button on. Why?
And with still no links to this incorrectly described (4 4 4 folded)
poster, and no response to those that questioned, criticized and
commented on his premature outburst towards a seller who was/is
willing to work with him-- speaks volumes about this individual's own
integrity and transparency.
I see he also occasionally lists a number of posters for sale on ebay,
with every color in the rainbow used in the descriptive fonts
(psychedelic trip?). Let's just hope that each and every flaw on those
posters have been accurately disclosed. I am willing to bet that there
are small imperfections that have not been seen and therefore, not
disclosed.
And if someone found an undisclosed flaw and wanted to return a
purchased poster to him, would this seller pay for return shipping
and/or take a price reduction decided by the unhappy buyer?
-KL
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Michael B <[email protected]> wrote:
> when a poster is "not as described" or has undisclosed defects, it
should be
> the seller that paye the return postage?
>
> i am waiting for the seller to confirm this.
>
> i was happy to see that the seller read my posting on MOPO, and
responded,
> but he needs to confirm that he will pay the return postage.
>
> michael
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>
___________________________________________________________________
How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type:
SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its
content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
