Haven't bought there, I would, and if the timing had been better on a few items 
over the years I'd have had no issue with doing that.
And credit where it's due, it was a flawless experience, Grey really helpful 
and a nice guy.

And, I think they accurately represented this one:
http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=660&lotNo=28274#Photo

(Within the range of accepted advertising practice of showing a product in the 
best light-perhaps a little flattering but not misleading.)

The card had been restored, (washed and re-backed) and there's an image of it 
prior to restoration on the back of Film Posters of the 40s.

Based on that I'd say it's a very good guide to how that window card should 
look, and that the one in the upcoming sale (that Bruce attached an image of) 
isn't accurately represented.

(I'd guess that as well as the discolouration around the edge that perhaps 
there's overall browning to the paper.)

The irony is, that while Bruce's somewhat unique and clever marketing approach 
is to be brutally honest to the point of being unflattering, I think in this 
instance Heritage has outdone him. And, that whoever wins it, once they see it 
in the flesh will be very pleasantly surprised.

I don't believe there's any massive conspiracy at Heritage to deliberately 
mislead people, I think it's just that in showing the posters at their best, 
sometimes they overcook it.

They put on superb auctions, and considering the fantastic paper they bring to 
market, I just I think they're letting themselves down with the images.

On 4 Mar 2012, at 04:12, Bruce Hershenson wrote:

> Do you think this window card was printed with these colors?
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 07:44 PM 3/3/2012, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
> Kerry
> 
> Obviously you are allowed to post anything you want, but please try
> hard to be sure it agrees with the opinions of those who disagree with
> you.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> Bruce, I completely disagree with this characterization of the thread.
> 
> I'd say it's more along the lines of:
> "when you post accusations, it is best to post about those things that you 
> have first-hand proof and experience about, so that your accusations will not 
> later be disputed as completely false or even just potentially false"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bruce Hershenson and the other 24 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
> P.O. Box 874
> West Plains, MO 65775
> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take 
> lunch)
> our site
> our auctions
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 



         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to