I agree, Steve. As i mentioned earlier, this discussion has also been
going on at APF. If someone wants to boost or enhance images in a book
or on their own site, containing posters in their collection that are
not for sale, that is all well and good.

Items for sale or auction, (and especially high end items) should be
shown as they truly are and appear (even after restoration or
backing). No extra color enhancement should be done to an item.

Ps- Others have expressed similar questions or observations, on other
poster message boards, franc. And isnt the purpose of a forum or
message board supposed to be a place to express opinions, observations
and to be able to ask questions without being jumped on? I wasnt
attacking you or HA.  Yet you reply with your "Get a grip" response.

If a simple question like "Does HA boost or saturate their online
images?" cannot be asked without individuals becoming upset or snippy,
then there is a problem.

-Kerry




On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Steven Hill <shil...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> My take on "boosted" images is simple.
> It's FINE to do that when presenting the imagesĀ for use in a book, or other
> decoration.
> It's NOT FINE to do that when presenting the images to sell the poster.
> -S
>
> --
> Steven Warren Hill shil...@sbcglobal.net shil...@yahoo.com
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to